Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 ) The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. CCP . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. ) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . ) Last. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) Room 402 5 ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 11 ) (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 11 ) These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 11 ) 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 ) However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. ) ) SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Code 3294. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Time of Hearing. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Court Clerk ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. ) 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 13 TENTATIVE RULING A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) ) As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. ) (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. ) 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 5 Civ. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Pro. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 give notice of the hearing date as required by law. ) As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. Attn: Appellate Court Services. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) 5 Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Complaint, 75.) ) ) See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). 11 ) 5 ) ) As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. ) Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Law and Motion (559) 457 . CCP 396b(a). ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. To the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 11 ) ) Plaintiffs shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM You can always see your envelopes ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. ) (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) Department 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 11 ) ) 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 ) 11 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ) 11 ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 5 A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. (MP&A p. Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. Department rules are available here. ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. Cal. Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). ) ) 11 ) ) Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 San Francisco, CA 94102 Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. ) 11 ) Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. ) ) B. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 ) If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. ) 5 Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. ) ) ) 11 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 11 ) Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. ) 11 ) ) ) And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 ) Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) ) A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . Before Trial Ch. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Court Clerk ) 11 ) 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Seagram's Lemon Italian Ice Nutrition Facts, Mike Adams Wife Shelly, Articles S